{"id":324352,"date":"2026-06-22T09:00:00","date_gmt":"2026-06-22T06:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ceotudent.com\/deep-work-deficit-index"},"modified":"2026-06-22T09:00:00","modified_gmt":"2026-06-22T06:00:00","slug":"deep-work-deficit-index","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ceotudent.com\/en\/deep-work-deficit-index","title":{"rendered":"The Deep Work Deficit Index: Measuring How Much Uninterrupted Focus You&#8217;re Actually Getting"},"content":{"rendered":"<blockquote>\n<p><strong>TL;DR:<\/strong> You almost certainly cannot answer the most important question about your working life: how many minutes of genuinely uninterrupted focus did you get yesterday? We measure steps and sleep and screen time, but the one resource that decides whether a day produced anything lasting goes uncounted. This article gives you the Deep Work Deficit Index, an original self-assessment that turns that blind spot into a number between 0 and 30 you can score in two minutes and act on the same day. It is grounded in verified research: Gloria Mark&rsquo;s twenty years of attention tracking shows average on-screen focus has fallen to 47 seconds; Microsoft&rsquo;s 2025 Work Trend Index found knowledge workers are interrupted every two minutes during core hours; the American Psychological Association puts the cost of task switching as high as 40% of productive time. The deficit is real and mostly invisible. Score it like a CEO who refuses to fly blind, then close it like a student who knows the exam is every single day.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>There is a number that quietly governs whether your working life adds up to something or just fills with motion. It is not your salary, your hours, or your task count. It is the amount of uninterrupted, cognitively demanding focus you actually get in a day, the kind of attention that builds skill, produces original work, and makes decisions that hold up. Almost nobody measures it. Most people cannot even estimate it, because the deficit is invisible from the inside: a fragmented day feels busy, and busy feels like progress.<\/p>\n<p>That blind spot is getting more expensive. The work that survives contact with capable AI is the work that requires judgment, synthesis, and depth, and that is precisely the work that needs uninterrupted focus to produce. The World Economic Forum&rsquo;s Future of Jobs Report 2025 names analytical thinking the single most-sought core skill of the next five years. Analytical thinking does not happen in 47-second windows between notifications. So the same era that makes deep focus more valuable is the era that has made it scarcest, and the gap between the two has a name. This article is about measuring that gap in your own week, and then closing it.<\/p>\n<div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_84 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\" style=\"cursor:inherit\">Table of Contents<\/p>\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"ez-toc-pull-right ez-toc-btn ez-toc-btn-xs ez-toc-btn-default ez-toc-toggle\" aria-label=\"Toggle Table of Content\"><span class=\"ez-toc-js-icon-con\"><span class=\"\"><span class=\"eztoc-hide\" style=\"display:none;\">Toggle<\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-icon-toggle-span\"><svg style=\"fill: #999;color:#999\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" class=\"list-377408\" width=\"20px\" height=\"20px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"none\"><path d=\"M6 6H4v2h2V6zm14 0H8v2h12V6zM4 11h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2zM4 16h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2z\" fill=\"currentColor\"><\/path><\/svg><svg style=\"fill: #999;color:#999\" class=\"arrow-unsorted-368013\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" width=\"10px\" height=\"10px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" version=\"1.2\" baseProfile=\"tiny\"><path d=\"M18.2 9.3l-6.2-6.3-6.2 6.3c-.2.2-.3.4-.3.7s.1.5.3.7c.2.2.4.3.7.3h11c.3 0 .5-.1.7-.3.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7zM5.8 14.7l6.2 6.3 6.2-6.3c.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7c-.2-.2-.4-.3-.7-.3h-11c-.3 0-.5.1-.7.3-.2.2-.3.5-.3.7s.1.5.3.7z\"\/><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/ceotudent.com\/en\/deep-work-deficit-index\/#Why-you-cannot-manage-what-you-have-never-measured\" >Why you cannot manage what you have never measured<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/ceotudent.com\/en\/deep-work-deficit-index\/#What-deep-work-actually-is-so-you-measure-the-right-thing\" >What deep work actually is, so you measure the right thing<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/ceotudent.com\/en\/deep-work-deficit-index\/#The-Deep-Work-Deficit-Index\" >The Deep Work Deficit Index<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/ceotudent.com\/en\/deep-work-deficit-index\/#How-to-read-your-score-like-a-CEO\" >How to read your score like a CEO<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/ceotudent.com\/en\/deep-work-deficit-index\/#Frequently-asked-questions\" >Frequently asked questions<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-6\" href=\"https:\/\/ceotudent.com\/en\/deep-work-deficit-index\/#Sources\" >Sources<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n<h2 id=\"why-you-cannot-manage-what-you-have-never-measured\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Why-you-cannot-manage-what-you-have-never-measured\"><\/span>Why you cannot manage what you have never measured<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>The reason your focus deficit stays hidden is that the feeling of fragmentation and the fact of it have come apart. You feel like you worked all day. The research says you mostly switched all day.<\/p>\n<p>Gloria Mark, a professor at the University of California, Irvine, has tracked attention on screens for twenty years using direct logging rather than self-report. When she started measuring in 2004, people averaged about two and a half minutes on a single screen before switching. By 2012 that had fallen to 75 seconds. Since around 2016 the average has been 47 seconds, a figure corroborated by five independent studies between 2014 and 2020. Forty-seven seconds is not a focus window. It is barely a thought.<\/p>\n<p>The interruptions that shatter focus are not free to recover from. Mark&rsquo;s most-cited finding is that after an interruption it takes an average of 23 minutes and 15 seconds to return fully to the original task. The arithmetic is brutal: a handful of interruptions an hour does not subtract a few minutes, it can subtract the hour. And the interruptions are no longer occasional. Microsoft&rsquo;s 2025 Work Trend Index, a special report built on aggregated Microsoft 365 signals through February 15, 2025, found that during 9-to-5 core hours employees are interrupted every two minutes by a meeting, email, or ping, adding up to 275 interruptions across the full day. In the same report, 48% of employees and 52% of leaders said their work already feels chaotic and fragmented.<\/p>\n<p>The fragmentation is partly self-inflicted through the tools themselves. A Harvard Business Review study published in August 2022, tracking 137 users across three Fortune 500 companies for up to five weeks, found that workers toggled between applications and websites roughly 1,200 times per day. The reorientation alone cost just under four hours each week, about 9% of all working time, spent simply remembering where you were. And switching is not a clean handoff. The American Psychological Association, summarizing the classic work of Rubinstein, Meyer, and Evans, reports that task switching can cost as much as 40% of someone&rsquo;s productive time, because each switch forces the brain through two stages it calls goal shifting and rule activation before it can perform again.<\/p>\n<p>None of these numbers appears on any dashboard you check. That is the whole problem. You can see your inbox count, your calendar, and your step total, but the resource all of those quietly consume, your capacity for deep work, is the one thing you never see a reading for.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"what-deep-work-actually-is-so-you-measure-the-right-thing\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"What-deep-work-actually-is-so-you-measure-the-right-thing\"><\/span>What deep work actually is, so you measure the right thing<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>Before you can score a deficit you have to define the asset. Cal Newport, in his 2016 book Deep Work, defines it as professional activities performed in a state of distraction-free concentration that push your cognitive capabilities to their limit. The definition does two useful things. It excludes shallow work, the logistical, easily replicable tasks that can be done while distracted, and it sets a bar: deep work has to stretch you, not just occupy you.<\/p>\n<p>That distinction is what makes deep work the right thing to measure in the AI era specifically. Shallow work is exactly the layer that capable AI absorbs first. Deep work, the kind that pushes your capabilities to their limit, is where your durable advantage lives. So the question the index below answers is narrow and deliberate: not how busy you are, but how much real, stretching, uninterrupted focus your week actually contains.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"the-verified-ground-in-one-place\">The verified ground in one place<\/h3>\n<p>Every number the index reacts to, traceable to a named source, before any framework is layered on top.<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Finding<\/th>\n<th>Figure<\/th>\n<th>Source<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Average on-screen attention before switching<\/td>\n<td>2.5 min (2004), 75 sec (2012), 47 sec (since ~2016)<\/td>\n<td>Gloria Mark, UC Irvine, Attention Span (2023)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Time to fully refocus after an interruption<\/td>\n<td>23 min 15 sec on average<\/td>\n<td>Gloria Mark, UC Irvine<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Interruptions during 9-to-5 core hours<\/td>\n<td>Every 2 minutes; 275 per full day<\/td>\n<td>Microsoft Work Trend Index 2025, Breaking Down the Infinite Workday<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Workers who say work feels chaotic and fragmented<\/td>\n<td>48% of employees, 52% of leaders<\/td>\n<td>Microsoft Work Trend Index 2025<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Daily switches between apps and websites<\/td>\n<td>~1,200 per day; ~4 hrs\/week reorienting (~9% of time)<\/td>\n<td>Harvard Business Review (August 2022)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Productive time lost to task switching<\/td>\n<td>Up to 40%<\/td>\n<td>American Psychological Association (Rubinstein, Meyer and Evans)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Most-sought core skill, next five years<\/td>\n<td>Analytical thinking (ranked first)<\/td>\n<td>World Economic Forum, Future of Jobs Report 2025<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>These are the conditions. The index is how you find out where you personally stand inside them.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"the-deep-work-deficit-index\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"The-Deep-Work-Deficit-Index\"><\/span>The Deep Work Deficit Index<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>The Deep Work Deficit Index is a CEOtudent self-assessment, not a clinical test or a measured statistic. Its dimensions, point values, and bands are framework design choices, chosen to be useful, not survey results. What it gives you is what the dashboards do not: a single, repeatable reading of how much uninterrupted focus your week actually holds, so a vague sense of being scattered becomes a number you can move.<\/p>\n<p>Score each of the six dimensions from 0 to 5, where 0 is the worst case and 5 is the ideal. Be honest about a typical week, not your best one. Add the six scores for a total out of 30.<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>#<\/th>\n<th>Dimension<\/th>\n<th>Score 0 (deficit)<\/th>\n<th>Score 5 (surplus)<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>1<\/td>\n<td><strong>Longest unbroken block<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>My longest focus block in a normal day is under 15 minutes<\/td>\n<td>I reliably get one block of 90+ minutes with no interruptions<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>2<\/td>\n<td><strong>Block frequency<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Deep blocks are rare and accidental, maybe one a week<\/td>\n<td>I have at least one protected deep block every working day<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>3<\/td>\n<td><strong>Interruption control<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Notifications and people reach me freely; I react as things arrive<\/td>\n<td>During deep blocks I am fully unreachable by design, not luck<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>4<\/td>\n<td><strong>Switch rate<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>I jump between apps, tabs, and tasks almost constantly<\/td>\n<td>I work on one thing at a time and close everything else<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>5<\/td>\n<td><strong>Recovery cost<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>After any interruption I struggle to get back for a long time<\/td>\n<td>Interruptions are so rare that recovery cost barely applies<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>6<\/td>\n<td><strong>Cognitive stretch<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>My focus, when I get it, goes to easy or routine tasks<\/td>\n<td>My protected focus goes to my hardest, highest-value work<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>Add your six scores. The total places you in one of four bands.<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Band<\/th>\n<th>Score<\/th>\n<th>What it means<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Critical deficit<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>0-9<\/td>\n<td>Your week has almost no deep work in it. You are running on shallow work and reaction, and any complex output is being produced in stolen, fragmented minutes. This is the most common band, and the most invisible, because it still feels busy.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Running a deficit<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>10-17<\/td>\n<td>You get real focus sometimes, but it is the exception. Deep work depends on luck, mood, and quiet days rather than structure, so it is the first thing to vanish in a hard week.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Roughly balanced<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>18-24<\/td>\n<td>You protect focus deliberately and it mostly holds. The risk is erosion: without maintenance, the defaults of the modern workday will quietly pull you back down.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Running a surplus<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>25-30<\/td>\n<td>Deep work is the spine of your week, not a happy accident. Your scarce attention is reliably aimed at your hardest, most valuable work. The job now is to defend the system you have built.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>A note on honesty, because the index is only as good as your input. The most common mistake is scoring dimension 6, cognitive stretch, too high. Plenty of people protect focus and then spend it on email triage and tidy busywork that merely feels productive. Protected attention aimed at shallow work is still a deficit, just a well-organized one. Score what your focus actually goes to, not how disciplined it feels.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"how-to-read-your-score-like-a-ceo\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"How-to-read-your-score-like-a-CEO\"><\/span>How to read your score like a CEO<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>A CEO does not read a balance sheet to feel good or bad. They read it to find the one line that is bleeding and fix that line first. Your index works the same way. The total tells you the severity; the individual dimensions tell you the cause; and the cause is almost always concentrated in one or two dimensions rather than spread evenly.<\/p>\n<p>So after you total your score, do the diagnostic step that most self-assessments skip: find your two lowest dimensions. Those are your binding constraints, the specific places the deficit is being created. A person scoring 12 because they cannot get a long block (dimension 1) has a completely different problem from a person scoring 12 because they fritter their good focus on easy work (dimension 6), even though the totals match. The total says how loud the alarm is. The low dimensions say which wire to cut.<\/p>\n<p>This is the CEO half of CEOtudent in its most literal form: you are allocating a scarce resource, your attention, and like any scarce resource it should be assigned to its highest-value use on purpose, not spent wherever the day happens to push it. The student half is what comes next, because closing the deficit means building a skill you do not currently have, and the move depends on your band.<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Your band<\/th>\n<th>The single highest-leverage move<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Critical deficit (0-9)<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Do not try to redesign your week. Win one 30-minute block tomorrow, phone in another room, notifications off, one hard task. The goal is not the work; it is proving to yourself that a protected block is possible. You cannot defend a habit you have never once performed.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Running a deficit (10-17)<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Stop relying on willpower and quiet days. Put one recurring deep block on your calendar as a non-negotiable appointment, same time daily, and protect it as if it were a meeting with your most important client. Structure beats motivation precisely because motivation is the thing that disappears on hard weeks.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Roughly balanced (18-24)<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Your problem is erosion, so the move is maintenance and a small raise. Audit the last week for the leaks that crept back in, then extend your protected block or add a second one. Re-score the index monthly; a balanced score is a reading, not a permanent state.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Running a surplus (25-30)<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Defend and aim. Your focus system works, so the leverage is no longer in getting focus but in pointing it at harder problems. Deliberately route your best block to the most ambiguous, highest-stakes work you have, the work that most rewards depth and that AI can least replicate.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>The pattern across all four bands is the same one the research demands. Focus in the modern workday does not happen by default; the default, every number above confirms, is fragmentation. Deep work is therefore something you build and defend on purpose, against an environment engineered to interrupt you every two minutes. The index just makes the invisible visible long enough for you to act before the day spends your attention for you.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"frequently-asked-questions\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Frequently-asked-questions\"><\/span>Frequently asked questions<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p><strong>How is the Deep Work Deficit Index different from screen-time or productivity trackers?<\/strong><br \/>\nScreen-time tools measure quantity of activity; they cannot tell deep work from frantic switching, and a fragmented day and a focused day can produce identical totals. The index measures the structure of your attention, how long your blocks are, how protected they are, and what they are aimed at, which is the thing that actually decides whether the time produced anything that compounds.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Is the index based on scientific data?<\/strong><br \/>\nThe conditions it reacts to are: Gloria Mark&rsquo;s attention research, Microsoft&rsquo;s 2025 Work Trend Index, the Harvard Business Review toggling study, and the American Psychological Association&rsquo;s work on switching costs are all cited above. The index itself, its six dimensions, point values, and bands, is a CEOtudent self-assessment framework designed to be useful, not a validated psychometric instrument or a population statistic. Treat the number as a personal reading you can act on and re-check, not as a clinical diagnosis.<\/p>\n<p><strong>What is a good score to aim for?<\/strong><br \/>\nMost people who score honestly land in the bottom two bands, so reaching roughly balanced (18-24) already puts your week far ahead of the fragmented default. Surplus (25-30) is the goal for anyone whose work depends on depth, but the more useful target than any single number is movement: re-score monthly and watch the trend, because a deficit that is shrinking matters more than a snapshot.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Does AI make this better or worse?<\/strong><br \/>\nBoth, which is the whole tension. AI can absorb shallow work and protect blocks by handling triage, but it also adds a new layer of switching, more tools, more notifications, more places to check. The deciding factor is whether you use AI to defend your deepest block or to fill it. The index measures the result either way.<\/p>\n<p><strong>How often should I re-score?<\/strong><br \/>\nMonthly is enough to catch erosion without becoming another thing to track. Re-score on a normal week, not a calm one, and pay attention to which dimensions move; the fix that worked shows up as a rising low dimension, and a new leak shows up as one quietly falling.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"sources\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Sources\"><\/span>Sources<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>World Economic Forum, Future of Jobs Report 2025.<br \/>\nGloria Mark, Attention Span: A Groundbreaking Way to Restore Balance, Happiness and Productivity, and associated University of California, Irvine attention research (2004-2023).<br \/>\nCal Newport, Deep Work: Rules for Focused Success in a Distracted World (2016).<br \/>\nMicrosoft Work Trend Index 2025, special report Breaking Down the Infinite Workday (Microsoft 365 signals through February 15, 2025).<br \/>\nHarvard Business Review, research on the cost of toggling between applications (August 2022).<br \/>\nAmerican Psychological Association, research summary on the cognitive costs of multitasking and task switching (Rubinstein, Meyer and Evans).<\/p>\n<hr>\n<p><em>This article was produced entirely with the assistance of artificial intelligence. It synthesizes publicly available research into an original analytical framework. The Deep Work Deficit Index is a self-assessment tool for personal reflection, not a clinical or psychometric instrument, and nothing here is professional, medical, or psychological advice. Verify any figure against the named primary source before relying on it for a decision.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Most people cannot tell you how much uninterrupted focus they got yesterday, which is strange, because it may be the single most important number in their working life. We track steps, calories, and screen time, but the one resource that decides whether your day produced anything that compounds goes completely unmeasured. This article fixes that. It gives you the Deep Work Deficit Index, an original self-assessment you can score in two minutes to turn a vague feeling of being scattered into a concrete number you can act on. It is built on verified research: Gloria Mark&#8217;s twenty years of attention tracking, Microsoft&#8217;s 2025 finding that knowledge workers are interrupted every two minutes, the Harvard Business Review toggling study, and the American Psychological Association&#8217;s work on switching costs. Read your score like a CEO reading a balance sheet, and close the deficit like a student who knows the test is daily.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":324357,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-324352","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-psikoloji","category-yasam"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ceotudent.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/324352","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ceotudent.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ceotudent.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ceotudent.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ceotudent.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=324352"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ceotudent.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/324352\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ceotudent.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/324357"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ceotudent.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=324352"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ceotudent.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=324352"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ceotudent.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=324352"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}