{"id":295870,"date":"2022-10-28T19:46:50","date_gmt":"2022-10-28T16:46:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ceotudent.com\/the-name-who-changed-art-history-with-a-urinal-marcel-duchamp"},"modified":"2022-10-28T19:46:50","modified_gmt":"2022-10-28T16:46:50","slug":"the-name-who-changed-art-history-with-a-urinal-marcel-duchamp","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ceotudent.com\/en\/the-name-who-changed-art-history-with-a-urinal-marcel-duchamp","title":{"rendered":"The Name Who Changed Art History with a Urinal: Marcel Duchamp"},"content":{"rendered":"
“My goal was to choose an object that didn’t interest me in any way, whether its beauty or ugliness. That is, to find a point of indifference when I look at it.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n<\/div>\n\nDuchamp had just named the urinal and signed it. Naturally, he was not involved in the production phase of the urinal in any way.<\/h2>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
This piece, which he called the Fountain, was just a urinal, no different from the millions of other urinals produced in any factory.<\/div>\n\n
\n<\/div>\n\nIn the face of such a work, the decision of the exhibition committee was clear. The Fountain was not considered a work of art and was not displayed.<\/h2>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
As a result of this decision, there was confusion in the art circle and many discussions arose. Duchamp left the association. According to Duchamp, who sees art as an idea rather than a craft, what matters is not the way the work is made or the materials used, but the idea\/motivation behind the work.<\/div>\n\n
\n<\/div>\n\nNew York Dadaists argued in The Blind Mind magazine why the Fountain is a work of art with the following three arguments:<\/h2>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n1) The selection of the object is a creative process in itself.
\n2) An object becomes a work of art when it is detached from its usefulness.
\n3) By giving the object a name and displaying it in an art gallery, a new idea or meaning is given to the object.<\/div>\n