{"id":156628,"date":"2022-01-05T18:20:48","date_gmt":"2022-01-05T15:20:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ceotudent.com\/what-is-ad-hominem-types-of-ad-hominem-and-examples-from-life"},"modified":"2022-11-01T21:42:52","modified_gmt":"2022-11-01T18:42:52","slug":"what-is-ad-hominem-types-of-ad-hominem-and-examples-from-life","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ceotudent.com\/en\/what-is-ad-hominem-types-of-ad-hominem-and-examples-from-life","title":{"rendered":"What is Ad Hominem? Types of Ad Hominem and Examples from Life"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"ad<\/p>\n

If you are arguing about a subject and the person is trying to include an irrelevant argument into the discussion and reconcile it with the subject, you are exposed to Ad Hominem. Alright, What is Ad Hominem?<\/em> What is Ad Hominem, what are its types and arguments? Together we take a close look.<\/p>\n

\n

What is Ad Hominem?<\/h2>\n

\"ad<\/p>\n

ad hominem<\/strong> (Latin for ‘to the person’), also called argumentum ad hominem or human slander fallacy. Generally this Latin term; refers to a rhetorical strategy in which the speaker attacks the character, purpose, or other characteristic of the person making the argument rather than attacking the essence of the argument. This creates a diversion on an irrelevant but often very loaded topic, preventing any real discussion.<\/p>\n

The most common form of this error “Person A makes claim X. Person B claims Person A has an undesirable trait, and therefore Person B concludes that argument X is false.”<\/em> is in the form.<\/p>\n

Valid ad hominem arguments<\/strong> ; It occurs in an informal logic where the person making the argument is based on arguments from authority in the form of testimony, expertise, or a selective presentation of information that supports what he or she is arguing for. In this situation; counter-arguments can be made that the target is dishonest, does not have the claimed expertise, or has a conflict of interest.<\/p>\n

Another valid type of ad hominem argument, generally encountered only in specialized philosophical use, refers to the dialectical strategy of using the target’s own beliefs and arguments against them, while disagreeing with the validity of those beliefs and arguments. Ad hominem arguments first in Ancient Greece<\/strong> examined. John Locke was later 17th century. century ad hominem arguments were reexamined.<\/p>\n

\n

The Function of Ad Hominem Arguments<\/h2>\n

Sometimes people use the ad hominem fallacy to directly appeal to other people’s feelings. As soon as you spot someone following you with an ad hominem argument, you can counter their attack in two moves:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Note the irrelevance of the emotional testimony they just presented to the discussion. Show their personal attacks on you and emphasize that it has nothing to do with the argument at hand.<\/li>\n
  2. After you uncover your weaknesses, move on. “I realize you think I’m A, B, and C, but that has nothing to do with what we’re discussing here.”<\/em> You can present counter-arguments.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
    \n

    Types of Ad Hominem<\/h2>\n

    \"ad<\/p>\n

    There are several types of ad hominem fallacies. All of them follow a general scheme in which, instead of dealing with the gist of one’s argument or trying to refute it, the interlocutor attacks the character of the defender of the argument and concludes that the attack refutes the argument. Let’s take a closer look at these defamation argument types:<\/p>\n